![[REVIEW] Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 DC HSM FLD AF Ultra Wide Zoom Lens for APS-C sized Sigma Digital DSLR Camera](http://phototube.info/wp-content/themes/covertvideopress/images/default.jpg "[REVIEW] Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 DC HSM FLD AF Ultra Wide Zoom Lens for APS-C sized Sigma Digital DSLR Camera")
![[REVIEW] Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 DC HSM FLD AF Ultra Wide Zoom Lens for APS-C sized Nikon Digital DSLR Camera](http://s2.dmcdn.net/AHrn3.jpg "[REVIEW] Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 DC HSM FLD AF Ultra Wide Zoom Lens for APS-C sized Nikon Digital DSLR Camera")
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
or copy the link
We got sent a question asking us: What would be better? A pro DSLR with a cheapo lens or a cheapo DSLR with an expensive lens? Well, we thought we’d answer that question in this video by asking two very different photographers to show us what they’re like. We tested the Canon 1D Mark IV with a Sigma 28-300mm f/something and a Canon 550D with a 24-70mm f/2.8L. What produces better results? Watch the video to find out. Twitter: twitter.com Facebook: www.facebook.com For the latest updates, visit our Blog: blog.digitalrev.com For more reviews, opinions, helps and tips visit: www.digitalrev.com
this Videos are amazing! you are a nice team!!!!!
they made a mistake because everything is sharp when its supposed to be blury
Hes very right. A high quality lens is the way to go.
This video goes to prove a point. All the shots he took could have easily been taken, with even higher quality on a simple fixed 35mm or 55mm lens, instead of having to lug that heavy thing all day. Lens would of been a hell of a lot faster as well, with better contrast.
i will take 1d mk4 with sigma. and i sell the 1d and buy 5d/7d + 24-70
The 1100D is the most basic, actually. I have it.
Good glass will never go out of fashion – camera bodies seem to change every 6 months these days.
kai, what an ass, a funny, but very big ass.
Pic at 2:56 says f/ 2.2 even though 24-70 goes only to 2.8
No need to bring nationalism into the issue…
Get over it. They’re just brand names.
When you’re in public, you can be photographed. In public, the law is on the side of the cameraman. Deal with it.
Hi,
I do not like when you talk about Canon produckt and you wear Nikon slip.
Someone’s a stupid American lol
5dmk3 and 18mm-55mm vs 1100d any l lens
The lens makes the picture, not the chip. Cheap lenses are expensive! The moment you buy them you have lost your money and the eBay-value is at 20%. Best solution is in my eyes the semi-pro body like (Canon 30D…60D) with pro lenses.
Why do you say that? It’s not illegal.
Thanks! This are good stuf!
But how about cheap body with 35 1.4 versus pro body with 50 1.8?
Another internet tough guy. No one would waste time taking pictures of someone like you anyway.
You do know that you can lower the resolution on YouTube, right? And it’s not an impersonation.
If you were smart i’d think you’d have a pretty thick strap around your neck, makes it kinda hard to snatch
Skip to 11:00 to get answer saved you time, if your impatient
good luck with that. Another sheep that puts faith in the justice system
doesnt mean he still wouldnt snatch that thing outta your hand tho. People like you put too much faith in law enforcement. They wont get to you in most cases 99% of the time. Learn to defend urself